CHALLENGES OF INDUSTRIAL COOPERATION IN THE EAEU COUNTRIES

Authors

  • A. Orozonova Sun Xiaomei

Keywords:

EAEU, industrial cooperation, digital economy, sanctions, Kyrgyzstan, China, integration.

Abstract

This article examines the trends and challenges in the development of industrial cooperation among the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) under the conditions of digital transformation, intensified sanctions pressure, and changes in global trade flows. Industrial cooperation is identified as a key instrument for ensuring economic resilience, technological sovereignty, and integrative interaction among the economies of Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Russia. The theoretical framework is based on the principles of international trade theory, economic integration, and innovation management. The study applies comparative, systemic, and statistical methods, as well as official documents of the Eurasian Economic Commission (EEC) and the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council, including Decisions No. 5 (2021) and No. 3 (2023). The results show that the EAEU is forming a network-based model of industrial integration that unites production, technological, and financial capacities. Priority areas of cooperation include mechanical engineering, metallurgy, the chemical and light industries, energy, and digital manufacturing. The effectiveness of cooperation depends on the level of digitalization and the coordination of industrial policies. The study identifies several constraints: fragmentation of production chains, differences in technical standards, uneven digital maturity, and limited access of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to financing. Additional challenges arise from Western sanctions and the U.S. tariff policy toward China, which highlight the growing strategic partnership between the EAEU and the People’s Republic of China. For the Kyrgyz Republic, participation in EAEU industrial cooperation and infrastructure development with China create new opportunities for industrial modernization, digital transformation, and export growth.

References

Glazyev, S. Y., Ivanter, V. V., Makarov, V. L., Nekipelov, A. D., Tatarkin, A. I., Grinberg, R. S., Fetisov, G. G., Tsvetkov, V. A., Batchikov, S. A., Ershov, M. V., Mityaev, D. A., & Petrov, Y. A. (2011). On the strategy of Russia’s economic development. Economic Science of Modern Russia, (3), 7–31.

Retrieved from https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17025501

Karlik, A. E., & Platonov, V. V. (2016). Network organization as a mechanism of industrial development. Problems of Theory and Practice of Management, (9), 92–102. Retrieved from https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26633434

Fukugawa, N. (2006). Determining factors in innovation of small firm networks: A case of cross-industry groups in Japan. Small Business Economics, 27(2–3), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-0010-2

Ivanter, V. V., & Komkov, N. I. (2016). Status and prospects of the development of Russia’s innovation sphere within the RAS Presidium program “Analysis and Forecast of Long-Term Trends of Scientific and Technological Development: Russia and the World.” Modernization. Innovation.

Development (MIR), 1, 76–82. https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2016.7.1.76.82

Castells, M. (2000). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture (O. I. Shkaratan, Ed.). Moscow: Higher School of Economics.

Dyatlov, S. A., Maryanenko, V. P., & Selishcheva, T. A. (2008). Information-network economy: Structure, dynamics, regulation. Saint Petersburg: SPbSUEF.

Weiss, E. H. (1999). Bits, atoms, and the technical writer: The rhetoric of STOP. Asterisk Journal of Computer Documentation, 23(3), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1145/330595.330602

Schmierl, K. (2007). Transformative capabilities in the “very old economy”: Intersectoral innovation networks and learning alliances. Revue Interventions Économiques, 35, 34–47. Retrieved from http://interventionseconomiques.revues.org/617

Karlik, A. E., & Platonov, V. V. (2015). Organizational and managerial innovations as a reserve for increasing competitiveness of Russian industry. Economic Revival of Russia, (4), 34–44. Retrieved from https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24147840

Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.

Rothaermel, F. T., & Hess, A. M. (2007). Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organization Science, 18(6), 898–921. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0291

Kleiner, G. B. (2015). State–region–industry–enterprise: The framework of systemic sustainability of the Russian economy. Part 1. Economy of Region, 2, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-2-4

Official Documents and Policy Sources of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)

Eurasian Intergovernmental Council. (2021, April 30). Decision No. 5: On the Main Directions of Industrial Cooperation within the Eurasian Economic Union until 2025. Retrieved from http://docs.eaeunion.org/docs/en-us/01429192/err_30042021_5

Eurasian Intergovernmental Council. (2018, November 27). Decision No. 5: On Amendments to the Decision of September 8, 2015, No. 9. Retrieved from http://docs.eaeunion.org/docs/en-us/01422839/icd_28112018_5

Eurasian Intergovernmental Council. (2020, October 9). Directive No. 21: On Joint Mea-sures to Develop Exports. Retrieved from http://docs.eaeunion.org/docs/en-us/01429045/err_06112020_21

Eurasian Economic Commission Council. (2017, December 20). Recommendation No. 3: On Measures to Promote Jointly Produced Goods of Priority Industries to Third-Country Markets. Retrieved from http://docs.eaeunion.org/docs/en-us/01417570/cncr_26122017_3

Free Trade Agreement between the Eurasian Economic Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, on the other hand. Retrieved from http://www.eurasiancommission.org/ru/act/trade/dotp/sogl_torg/Documents/Вьетнам/EAEU-VN%20FTA_rus.pdf

Agreement on the Free Trade Area between the Eurasian Economic Union and the People’s Republic of China. Retrieved from http://www.eurasiancommission.org

Eurasian Development Bank (EDB). (2023). Eurasian Integration Report 2023: Industrial Cooperation and Digital Transformation in the EAEU. Almaty: EDB Analytical Department. Retrieved from https://eabr.org/en/analytics/integration-reports/

Eurasian Economic Commission. (2024). Annual Report on the State of Industrial Cooperation within the EAEU. Moscow: EEC Department of Industrial Policy. Retrieved from https://eec.eaeunion.org

Published

2026-01-19

How to Cite

Орозонова А. Сун Сяомей. (2026). CHALLENGES OF INDUSTRIAL COOPERATION IN THE EAEU COUNTRIES. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC, (7), 129–136. Retrieved from https://ilim.uia.gov.kg/index.php/main/article/view/1052